Legal Opinion

State v. Haney

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided January 13, 1999No. C9610-37585; CA A96525PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDe Muniz, P. J.

Defendant appeals her conviction for possession of a schedule II controlled substance. ORS 475.992 (4). We affirm.

Following the trial court’s denial of defendant’s motion to suppress evidence, defendant was convicted in a bench trial on stipulated facts. At 3:00 a.m. on October 15, 1996, Portland Police Bureau Officer Francis observed a truck with three occupants stop at what he believed was a “meth house.” One occupant entered the house and returned five to ten minutes later. Francis followed the truck and pulled it over a few blocks later for having a defective license plate light. As he…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. BatesOregon Supreme Court · 1987
  2. State v. RickardCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997
  3. State v. SennCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
  4. State v. PetersonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
  5. State v. WrightCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. AmellCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009
  2. State v. WilsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2017
  3. State v. LeeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API