State v. Haney
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtDe Muniz, P. J.
Defendant appeals her conviction for possession of a schedule II controlled substance. ORS 475.992 (4). We affirm.
Following the trial court’s denial of defendant’s motion to suppress evidence, defendant was convicted in a bench trial on stipulated facts. At 3:00 a.m. on October 15, 1996, Portland Police Bureau Officer Francis observed a truck with three occupants stop at what he believed was a “meth house.” One occupant entered the house and returned five to ten minutes later. Francis followed the truck and pulled it over a few blocks later for having a defective license plate light. As he…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- State v. BatesOregon Supreme Court · 1987
- State v. RickardCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997
- State v. SennCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
- State v. PetersonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
- State v. WrightCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. AmellCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009
- State v. WilsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2017
- State v. LeeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014