Legal Opinion

State v. Mastin

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided December 21, 2005No. 0205-32755; A121763PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWollheim, J.

Defendant appeals his convictions for delivery of a controlled substance (methamphetamine), ORS 475.992(l)(b), possession of a controlled substance (methamphetamine), ORS 475.992(4)(b), and criminal forfeiture, Or Laws 2001, ch 666, § 12, arguing that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress evidence of the contents of his backpack, his identification, oral statements he made, and methamphetamine discovered in the trunk of the vehicle in which he was a passenger. Defendant raises three assignments of error, arguing that (1) because he was a passenger, the officer had no…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. State v. EhlyOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  2. State v. OwensOregon Supreme Court · 1986
  3. State v. HallOregon Supreme Court · 2005
  4. State v. KennedyOregon Supreme Court · 1981
  5. State v. MillerOregon Supreme Court · 1985

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. RodgersCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
  2. State v. HighleyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
  3. State v. MastinCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006
  4. State v. CochranCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API