State v. Herrera-Sorrosa

Defendant appeals his convictions for possession of a controlled substance, ORS 475.992(4), resisting arrest, ORS 162.315, and escape in the third degree, ORS 162.145, assigning error to the trial court’s denial of his motion to suppress evidence, including methamphetamine, discovered as a result of a warrantless search. Defendant asserts that, under ORS 810.410(3) and the analysis of State v. Dominguez-Martinez, 321 Or 206, 895 P2d 306 (1995), suppression was required, and, alternatively, that suppression was required because defendant was “stopped” without reasonable suspicion. We conclude…