Legal Opinion

Grant v. Stoyer

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided October 13, 2000No. S-9016PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

EASTAUGH, Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

Catherine Grant sued Peggy Stoyer for causing an automobile accident that injured Grant. Stoyer admitted negligence and Grant's case went to trial only on causation and damages. Although the uncontroverted trial evidence established that the accident had caused Grant painful injuries requiring medical treatment, the jury awarded her no damages. The superior court denied Grant's motion for a new trial. Because the evidence that Stoyer's negligence caused Grant to suffer painful injuries requiring medical treatment was uncontroverted, we reverse and…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Neison v. HinesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  2. Snover v. McGrawIllinois Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Hayes v. Xerox Corp.Alaska Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Hutchins v. SchwartzAlaska Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Richey v. OenAlaska Supreme Court · 1992

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Glamann v. KirkAlaska Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Asrc Energy Services Power v. Golden Valley Electric Ass'nAlaska Supreme Court · 2011
  3. Domke v. Alyeska Pipeline Service Co., Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Sisters of Providence v. A.A. Pain Clinic, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2003
  5. Hogg v. Raven Contractors, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2006

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API