Legal Opinion

Snover v. McGraw

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided June 20, 1996No. 79305PublishedCited by 72 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Nickels

The issue presented in this appeal is whether a jury is required to make an award for pain and suffering where it awards damages for pain-related medical expenses. The underlying action is a negligence action brought by plaintiffs, Kimberly Snover and her mother, Carol Snover, to recover for personal injuries suffered by Kimberly in an automobile collision. At the time of the collision, Kimberly was a passenger in a car driven by defendant, Bridget McGraw. After the collision, Kimberly incurred medical expenses, part of which both she and her mother paid. The jury returned verdicts in favor…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Maple v. GustafsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Gill v. FosterIllinois Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Caley v. ManickeIllinois Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Hollis v. R. Latoria Construction, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Robertson Ex Rel. Robertson v. StanleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by72 opinions

  1. Franz v. Calaco Development Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2004
  2. BRUSO BY BRUSO v. Alexian Bros. Hosp.Illinois Supreme Court · 1997
  3. LID ASSOCIATES v. DolanAppellate Court of Illinois · 2001
  4. Zuder v. GibsonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1997
  5. Stift v. LizzadroAppellate Court of Illinois · 2005

67 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API