Legal Opinion
Sisters of Providence v. A.A. Pain Clinic, Inc.
Alaska Supreme Court
Decided December 19, 2003No. S-10390, S-10419PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MATTHEWS, Justice.
Sisters of Providence in Washington, d/b/a Providence Hospital Anchorage ("Providence"), entered into an exclusive contract with Providence Anchorage Anesthesia Medical Group ("the Group") for chronic pain management services. Leon Chandler, M.D., and Michael Borrello, M.D., are anesthesiologists who were excluded by the contract and claim to have been harmed by it. They sued for anti-competitive conduct and received a jury award that was in part set aside by the trial court. This case involves a number of challenges to the verdict and to the trial court's rulings.
BACK…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- American Tobacco Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Aspen Skiing Co. v. Aspen Highlands Skiing Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Business Electronics Corp. v. Sharp Electronics Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Capital Imaging Associates, P.C. v. Mohawk Valley Medical Associates, Inc., Mohawk Valley Physicians Plan, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
- Tafford E. Oltz v. St. Peter's Community Hospital, Tafford E. Oltz v. St. Peter's Community HospitalCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Gefre v. Davis Wright Tremaine, LLPAlaska Supreme Court · 2013
- BARON FINANCIAL CORP. v. NatanzonDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2006
- Petrolane Inc. v. RoblesAlaska Supreme Court · 2007
- Asrc Energy Services Power v. Golden Valley Electric Ass'nAlaska Supreme Court · 2011
- Azimi v. JohnsAlaska Supreme Court · 2011
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.