Legal Opinion

Hogg v. Raven Contractors, Inc.

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided May 5, 2006No. S-11874PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FABE, Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

This appeal arises from the superior court’s denial of a motion for a new trial. The verdict at issue arose from a negligence action that Donald Hogg brought against Raven Contractors and Kenai Peninsula Borough after Hogg fell into a trash container at the Kenai Transfer Facility. Although the jury found that Raven, the operator of the facility, had been negligent, it determined that Raven’s negligence was not a legal cause of Hogg’s injury. Hogg’s subsequent motion for a new trial was denied, and he claims on appeal that the trial court did not apply the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Glamann v. KirkAlaska Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Kava v. American Honda Motor Co., Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Richey v. OenAlaska Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Pugliese v. PerdueAlaska Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Grant v. StoyerAlaska Supreme Court · 2000

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. RODERER v. DashAlaska Supreme Court · 2010
  2. Cameron v. CHANG-CRAFTAlaska Supreme Court · 2011
  3. Hunter v. Philip Morris USA Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2015
  4. Maddox v. HardyAlaska Supreme Court · 2008
  5. Zamarello v. RegesAlaska Supreme Court · 2014

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API