Legal Opinion

Richey v. Oen

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided January 24, 1992No. S-4188PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MOORE, Justice.

This appeal arises from a personal injury action filed by Sharon Richey and her husband, Alan Richey, against Glen Oen, Aaron, Inc., d/b/a Rent-A-Wreck, and Roy Straub, d/b/a Rent-A-Wreck. Sharon Richey (Richey) was rear-ended by an automobile driven by Oen and rented by him from Rent-A-Wreck. Richey settled with Rent-A-Wreck and proceeded to trial against Oen. At trial, Oen claimed that Richey’s injuries were due to a pre-existing condition. The superior court granted Richey’s motion for a directed verdict on the issue of negligence and advised counsel that the issue of…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Holiday Inns of America, Inc. v. PeckAlaska Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Hayes v. Xerox Corp.Alaska Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Mullen v. ChristiansenAlaska Supreme Court · 1982
  4. In re L.A.M.Alaska Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Buoy v. ERA Helicopters, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1989

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. RODERER v. DashAlaska Supreme Court · 2010
  2. Asrc Energy Services Power v. Golden Valley Electric Ass'nAlaska Supreme Court · 2011
  3. Ben Lomond, Inc. v. SchwartzAlaska Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Municipality of Anchorage, Police & Fire Retirement Board v. CoffeyAlaska Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Reeves v. Alyeska Pipeline Service Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 2002

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API