Legal Opinion

Barber v. George

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided November 13, 1996No. 94-4275-L-1; CA A90626PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWarren, P. J.

Plaintiffs’ daughter sustained injuries when the automobile she was driving was struck by an automobile driven by defendants’ son, Tom. Plaintiffs brought this action as conservators of their daughter’s estate, to recover damages for her injuries, seeking to hold Tom’s parents vicariously liable for the negligence of their son under the family purpose doctrine or directly liable under the theory of negligent entrustment. The trial court granted defendants’ motion for summary judgment and dismissed plaintiffs’ claims. We affirm.

We review the record in the manner most favorable to plaintiffs to…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Jones v. General Motors Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
  2. Kraxberger v. RogersOregon Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Pesqueira v. TalbotCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1968
  4. Brown v. StogsdillCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1984
  5. Page v. SparlingCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1987

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Outdoor Media Dimensions Inc. v. StateCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997
  2. Young v. BeckArizona Supreme Court · 2011
  3. Arizpe v. VankirkCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006
  4. Rogozhnikov v. Essex InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
  5. Weber v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API