Legal Opinion

Rogozhnikov v. Essex Insurance

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided October 8, 2008No. 060201786, A133503PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtArmstrong, J.

Plaintiff appeals a judgment for defendants, assigning error to the grant of defendants’ motions for summary judgment and to the denial of plaintiffs motion for summary judgment. Plaintiff, as personal representative for Grigory Rogozhnikov’s estate, filed a declaratory judgment action seeking uninsured motorist (UM) benefits under an automobile insurance policy issued by defendant Essex Insurance Company (Essex), and under which defendant Broadway Cab, LLC (Broadway) remained self-insured for the first portion of coverage. On appeal, the parties raise three arguments about the application…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Jones v. General Motors Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Vega v. Farmers InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1996
  4. State v. ClevengerOregon Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Schaffer v. Mill Owners Mutual InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1965

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. HansenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API