Legal Opinion

Jones v. General Motors Corp.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided February 21, 1996No. 9304-02799; CA A84036PublishedCited by 48 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*246De MUNIZ, J.

Plaintiff appeals from a judgment entered after the court granted defendants’ motion for summary judgment. We reverse.

Plaintiff is a Portland police officer. Defendant General Motors manufactured a 1991 Chevrolet Caprice that defendant Wentworth Chevrolet sold to the City of Portland (the City) for use as a patrol car. After the City purchased the car in March 1991, City mechanics installed a radio and other electrical equipment in the car. When they installed the equipment, the mechanics drilled a 3/4-inch diameter hole in the bulkhead that separates the engine compartment from…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by48 opinions

  1. Jones v. General Motors Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Hardie v. Legacy Health SystemCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
  3. Schram v. Albertson's, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1997
  4. Herman v. Valley InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
  5. Davis v. County of ClackamasCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API