Legal Opinion

Pesqueira v. Talbot

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided May 9, 1968No. 2 CA-CIV 455PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MOLLOY, Judge.

This case involves consideration of the “family purpose doctrine.” We are called upon to determine whether, notwithstanding that doctrine, summary judgments were properly entered in favor of the mother and father of a minor female whose alleged negligent operation of an automobile resulted in injuries to plaintiff.

From the evidence before the court on the motions for summary judgment, which include depositions of the mother and driver-daughter and an affidavit of the latter, together with various other depositions and exhibits, the case in its present posture may be stated as…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. McKay v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Peterson v. Valley National Bank of PhoenixArizona Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Calhoun v. EavesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1966
  4. Hackley v. RobeySupreme Court of Virginia · 1938
  5. Smith v. SimpsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Herman v. MagnusonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Starr v. HillTennessee Supreme Court · 2011
  3. Atkin F. Seltzer and Helen Seltzer, His Wife v. William W. Chesley, Jr., as Special Administrator of the Estate of Linda Joyce Berryhill, DeceasedCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
  4. Campbell v. PaschalCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1986
  5. Allstate Insurance Company v. PesqueriaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1973

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API