Weber v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtArmstrong, P. J.
The Teuberts were injured on February 20, 2004, when the car in which they were traveling was struck by a car driven by Ronningen. The car driven by Ronningen was insured by State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company under a policy issued to Weber. State Farm sought a declaration that it had no obligation to defend and indemnify Ronningen for claims made by the Teuberts in connection with the accident, because, as a matter of law, Ronningen was neither an insured nor a permissive user under Weber’s policy. Teuberts appeal a judgment for State Farm, assigning error to the grant of State…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Jones v. General Motors Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1997
- Fagg v. Massachusetts Bonding & InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1933
- State v. LiefertMontana Supreme Court · 2002
- Farmers Insurance Exchange v. CrutchfieldCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
- McCabe v. State of OregonOregon Supreme Court · 1992
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.