Legal Opinion

Weber v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided November 28, 2007No. 040909851; A131581Published

1Opinion of the CourtArmstrong, P. J.

The Teuberts were injured on February 20, 2004, when the car in which they were traveling was struck by a car driven by Ronningen. The car driven by Ronningen was insured by State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company under a policy issued to Weber. State Farm sought a declaration that it had no obligation to defend and indemnify Ronningen for claims made by the Teuberts in connection with the accident, because, as a matter of law, Ronningen was neither an insured nor a permissive user under Weber’s policy. Teuberts appeal a judgment for State Farm, assigning error to the grant of State…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Jones v. General Motors Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Fagg v. Massachusetts Bonding & InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1933
  3. State v. LiefertMontana Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Farmers Insurance Exchange v. CrutchfieldCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
  5. McCabe v. State of OregonOregon Supreme Court · 1992

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API