Brown v. Stogsdill

OPINION

HOWARD, Judge.

The question in this case is whether the family purpose doctrine may be applicable so as to make the defendants/appellees liable for damages arising from personal injuries sustained by plaintiff/appellant' in an automobile accident in which their son was driving. As this is an appeal from the granting of summary judgment, the facts should be viewed in the light most favorable to appellant. Rowe v. Schultz, 131 Ariz. 536, 642 P.2d 881 (App.1982).

THE FACTS

Christopher Stogsdill was the driver of the car in which plaintiff Kevin Brown was a passenger. They were involved in a…