Legal Opinion

U.S. Specialty Insurance Co. v. James Courtney Law Office, P.A.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided June 19, 2003No. C2-01-1813PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BLATZ, Chief Justice.

Appellant U.S. Specialty Insurance Company brought a declaratory judgment action to determine whether exclusions in a standard aviation liability insurance policy issued to respondents James Courtney and James Courtney III Law Office, P.A. violated state law. The district court found that the policy exclusions, which excluded coverage for claims made by employees for work-related injuries, were violative of Minn.Stat. § 60A.081, subd. 2 (2002). Minnesota Statutes section 60A.081, subd. 2 states that:

[N]o policy of insurance issued or delivered in this state…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Thiele v. StichSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
  2. Miller v. ShugartSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
  3. Brookfield Trade Center, Inc. v. County of RamseySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1998
  4. Lobeck v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1998
  5. State Ex Rel. Beaulieu v. RSJ, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1996

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Meintsma v. Loram Maintenance of Way, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2004
  2. State v. KilmerCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2007
  3. Schaefer v. Tea Area School District 41-5South Dakota Supreme Court · 2015
  4. Daniel v. City of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2019
  5. Opay v. Experian Information Solutions, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2004

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API