Legal Opinion
Schaefer v. Tea Area School District 41-5
South Dakota Supreme Court
Decided November 10, 2015No. 27330PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
GILBERTSON, Chief Justice.
[¶ 1.] Chris Schaefer appeals the Tea Area School Board’s (the Board) denial of his request for a minor boundary change. If granted, the change would have resulted in the detachment of Schaefer’s and other property from the Tea Area School District (TASD) and the annexation of the same to the Sioux Falls School District (SFSD). Schaefer asserts the denial was an abuse of discretion. We affirm.
Facts and Procedural History
[¶ 2.] The city of Sioux Falls spans at least eight different school districts. 1 The TASD, one of those districts, was created in 2004 by the Lennox…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Bowman Transportation, Inc. v. Arkansas-Best Freight System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Burlington Truck Lines, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Dunker v. Brown County Board of EducationSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1963
- Ray Marshall, Secretary of Labor v. Knutson Construction Company and Occupational Safety and Health Review CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1977
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Athens School District v. Vermont State Board of EducationSupreme Court of Vermont · 2020