Legal Opinion

Lobeck v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided July 30, 1998No. CX-97-421PublishedCited by 103 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

PAUL H. ANDERSON, Justice.

' The question we must answer in this case is straightforward: is a provision in an automobile insurance policy valid and enforceable when it excludes coverage for an insured if the insured’s liability to a third party arises while the insured was driving a vehicle without permission? The Hennepin County District Court concluded that such an exclusion was valid and enforceable and granted summary judgment for the insurance company that denied coverage. The Minnesota Court of Appeals reversed, concluding that such an exclusion violates the Minnesota No-Fault…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Cooper v. FrenchSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
  2. Bobich v. OjaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
  3. State Farm Insurance Companies v. SeefeldSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
  4. Wasche v. Milbank Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
  5. American Family Mutual Insurance Co. v. RyanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by103 opinions

  1. Founders Insurance v. MunozIllinois Supreme Court · 2010
  2. Thommes v. Milwaukee Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2002
  3. Carlson v. Allstate Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2008
  4. Progressive Northern Insurance v. McDonoughCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2010
  5. Wanzek Construction, Inc. v. Employers Insurance of WausauSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2004

98 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API