Legal Opinion

State v. Kilmer

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided November 20, 2007No. A06-2052PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SHUMAKER, Judge.

Justin Allen Kilmer appeals from a DWI conviction, arguing that because the arresting officer’s only reason for stopping him was that he entered an intersection while the controlling traffic light was yellow, that officer lacked articulable suspicion of criminal activity justifying the stop. The district court held that Minnesota law prohibits drivers from entering an intersection when a traffic light is yellow, and on this basis found the officer’s stop was legal. Because we conclude that the district court erred in its reading of the applicable statute, we reverse.

FACT…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. United States v. CortezSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. Berge v. Commissioner of Public SafetySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
  3. State v. GeorgeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1997
  4. State v. AndersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2004
  5. State v. BrittonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2000

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. WrightSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
  2. Gilmore v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2012
  3. State v. Antonio D. BrownWisconsin Supreme Court · 2014
  4. In Re Disciplinary Action Against LightSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2007
  5. State v. Antonio D. BrownWisconsin Supreme Court · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API