Legal Opinion
James Acs v. The Detroit Edison Company
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided April 14, 2006No. 05-1042PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SUTTON, Circuit Judge.
Congress enacted the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, Pub.L. No. 75-718, 52 Stat. 1060 (codified as amended at 29 U.S.C. §§ 201 et seq.), “to compensate those who labored in excess of the statutory maximum number of hours for the wear and tear of extra work,” Bay Ridge Operating Co. v. Aaron, 334 U.S. 446, 460, 68 S.Ct. 1186, 92 L.Ed. 1502 (1948). Consistent with this goal, the Act “requires em ployers to pay their employees time-and-a-half for work performed in excess of forty hours per week,” Schaefer v. Ind. Mich. Power Co., 358 F.3d 394, 399 (6th Cir.2004), but…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Auer v. RobbinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Bowles v. Seminole Rock & Sand Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Arnold v. Ben Kanowsky, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Bay Ridge Operating Co. v. AaronSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Anthony Martin v. Indiana Michigan Power Company, D/B/A American Electric PowerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Havey v. Homebound Mortgage, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2008
- Dong Yi and Edgar Martinez, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated v. Sterling Collision Centers, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2007
- IntraComm, Inc. v. BajajCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2007
- Renfro v. Indiana Michigan Power Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
- Baden-Winterwood v. Life Time Fitness, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.