Legal Opinion
Havey v. Homebound Mortgage, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided October 22, 2008No. Docket 06-0978-cvPublishedCited by 94 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PIERRE N. LEVAL and JOSÉ A. CABRANES, Circuit Judges:
Plaintiff-appellant Linda Havey (“Ha-vey”), who was formerly employed as a mortgage underwriter by defendant-appel-lee Homebound Mortgage (“Homebound”), brought this action claiming that Home-bound and its officers failed to pay her overtime compensation as required by the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA” or “the Act”), 29 U.S.C. § 201 et seq. Defendants responded that Havey was employed in “a bona fide ... administrative ... capacity” and was therefore exempt from the overtime provisions of the FLSA. 29 U.S.C. § 213(a)(1). The United…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Auer v. RobbinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Tennessee Coal, Iron & Railroad v. Muscoda Local No. 123Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Lynn Martin, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor v. Malcolm Pirnie, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991
- Singh v. City of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2008
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by94 opinions
- Young v. Cooper Cameron Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2009
- Anemone v. Metropolitan Transportation AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2011
- Cannon v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2013
- Summa v. Hofstra UniversityDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2010
- Davis v. J.P. Morgan Chase & Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2009
89 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.