Legal Opinion

Bowles v. Seminole Rock & Sand Co.

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided June 4, 1945No. 914PublishedCited by 1,515 opinions

1Opinion of the Court 1

325 U.S. 410 (1945)

BOWLES, PRICE ADMINISTRATOR,

v.

SEMINOLE ROCK & SAND CO.

No. 914.

Supreme Court of United States.

Argued April 26, 27, 1945.

Decided June 4, 1945.

CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT.

Mr. Henry M. Hart, Jr., pro hac vice, with whom Solicitor General Fahy, Messrs. Robert L. Stern and David London were on the brief, for petitioner.

Mr. Robert H. Anderson, with whom Messrs. Robert Ruark, Bennett H. Perry and J.M. Hemphill were on the brief, for respondent.

2Opinion of the Court · MurphyJustice Murphy

Our consideration here is directed to the proper interpretation and application of certain provisions…

3Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Yakus v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  2. Lockerty v. PhillipsSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  3. Bowles v. Seminole Rock & Sand Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1944
  4. Bowles, Price Administrator, v. Seminole Rock & Sand Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945

4Cited by1,515 opinions

  1. Stinson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Christensen v. Harris CountySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. Robertson v. Methow Valley Citizens CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Thomas Jefferson University v. ShalalaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  5. Kisor v. WilkieSupreme Court of the United States · 2019

1,510 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API