Bay Ridge Operating Co. v. Aaron
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Reed
These cases present another aspect of the perplexing problem of what constitutes the regular rate of pay which the Fair Labor Standards Act requires to be used in computing the proper payment for work in excess of forty hours. The applicable provisions read as follows:
“Sec. 7. (a) No employer shall, except as otherwise provided in this section, employ any of his *449employees who is engaged in commerce or in the production of goods for commerce—(3) for a workweek longer than forty hours after the expiration of the second year from such date,
unless such employee receives compensation for his…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Anderson v. Mt. Clemens Pottery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Brooklyn Savings Bank v. O'NeilSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Overnight Motor Transportation Co. v. MisselSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Tennessee Coal, Iron & Railroad v. Muscoda Local No. 123Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- A. B. Kirschbaum Co. v. WallingSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by236 opinions
- Barrentine v. Arkansas-Best Freight System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Allen v. Board of Public Educ. for Bibb CountyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2007
- Powell v. United States Cartridge Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Sivetts v. Board of County CommissionersCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2014
- Singer v. City of Waco, TexasCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2003
231 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.