Bradbury v. Valencia
Utah Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
WILKINS, Justice:
¶1 Phil and Opal Valencia appeal the trial court's order granting Randy and Dawn Bradbury's motion for summary judgment. We conclude we lack jurisdiction because the Valencias have not appealed from a final order and no exception to the final judgment rule has been met. We therefore dismiss the appeal without reaching the merits.
BACKGROUND
¶ 2 In September 1996, the Bradburys filed a complaint against the Valencias. 1 The complaint alleged that the Bradburys had a legal right-of-way along a road that ran next to their house and land. The complaint further alleged that the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- A.J. MacKay Co. v. Okland Construction Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1991
- Kennecott Corp. v. Utah State Tax CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1991
- ProMax Development Corp. v. RaileUtah Supreme Court · 2000
- Kennedy v. New Era Industries, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1979
- U.P.C., Inc. v. R.O.A. General, Inc.Court of Appeals of Utah · 1999
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by134 opinions
- America West Bank Members L.C. v. StateUtah Supreme Court · 2014
- State v. ClarkUtah Supreme Court · 2011
- Miller v. USAA Casualty Insurance Co.Utah Supreme Court · 2002
- Loffredo v. HoltUtah Supreme Court · 2001
- Powell v. CannonUtah Supreme Court · 2008
129 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.