A.J. MacKay Co. v. Okland Construction Co.
Utah Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
ZIMMERMAN, Justice:
Appellant A.J. Mackay Company (“Mac-kay”) appeals from the trial court’s order denying its motion for summary judgment and granting summary judgment to appel-lee Okland Construction Company (“Ok-land”). Mackay, a subcontractor and the plaintiff below, sought a summary judgment to enforce an arbitration clause in an agreement between itself and Okland, the general contractor. Okland filed a cross-motion for summary judgment and a counterclaim. In support of its summary judgment motion, Okland asserted that Mackay could not bring and maintain an action on the contract because…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Pate v. Marathon Steel Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1984
- Kennecott Corp. v. Utah State Tax CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1991
- Olson v. Salt Lake City School DistrictUtah Supreme Court · 1986
- Kennedy v. New Era Industries, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1979
- Williams v. StateUtah Supreme Court · 1986
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by61 opinions
- Bradbury v. ValenciaUtah Supreme Court · 2000
- State v. BrownUtah Supreme Court · 1992
- Miller v. USAA Casualty Insurance Co.Utah Supreme Court · 2002
- Sims v. Collection Division of the Utah State Tax CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1992
- Loffredo v. HoltUtah Supreme Court · 2001
56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.