Legal Opinion

A.J. MacKay Co. v. Okland Construction Co.

Utah Supreme Court

Decided August 16, 1991No. 890172PublishedCited by 61 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ZIMMERMAN, Justice:

Appellant A.J. Mackay Company (“Mac-kay”) appeals from the trial court’s order denying its motion for summary judgment and granting summary judgment to appel-lee Okland Construction Company (“Ok-land”). Mackay, a subcontractor and the plaintiff below, sought a summary judgment to enforce an arbitration clause in an agreement between itself and Okland, the general contractor. Okland filed a cross-motion for summary judgment and a counterclaim. In support of its summary judgment motion, Okland asserted that Mackay could not bring and maintain an action on the contract because…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Pate v. Marathon Steel Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Kennecott Corp. v. Utah State Tax CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Olson v. Salt Lake City School DistrictUtah Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Kennedy v. New Era Industries, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Williams v. StateUtah Supreme Court · 1986

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by61 opinions

  1. Bradbury v. ValenciaUtah Supreme Court · 2000
  2. State v. BrownUtah Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Miller v. USAA Casualty Insurance Co.Utah Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Sims v. Collection Division of the Utah State Tax CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Loffredo v. HoltUtah Supreme Court · 2001

56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API