Legal Opinion

Scharf v. BMG Corp.

Utah Supreme Court

Decided April 16, 1985No. 18963PublishedCited by 183 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ZIMMERMAN, Justice:

Defendant Vernon R. Erickson personally guaranteed leases on two pieces of repossessed equipment. He appeals from a deficiency judgment entered against him after the lessor, Kathy Scharf, sold the equipment. Erickson claims that Scharf s sale of the equipment was not “commercially reasonable” and that the notice of sale actually given did not constitute “reasonable notification,” all as required by section 70A-9-504(3) of the Code. U.C.A., 1953, § 70A-9-504(3) (1980 ed.). For the reasons set forth below, we affirm.

In the spring of 1979, Scharf, doing business as Western…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Management Services Corp. v. Development AssociatesUtah Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Charlton v. HackettUtah Supreme Court · 1961
  3. FMA Financial Corp. v. Pro-PrintersUtah Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Hal Taylor Associates v. Unionamerica, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Betenson v. Call Auto & Equipment Sales, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1982

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by183 opinions

  1. State v. RamirezUtah Supreme Court · 1991
  2. State v. VerdeUtah Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Crookston v. Fire Insurance ExchangeUtah Supreme Court · 1991
  4. State v. NielsenUtah Supreme Court · 2014
  5. Blue Cross and Blue Shield v. StateUtah Supreme Court · 1989

178 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API