Legal Opinion
Waddoups v. Amalgamated Sugar Co.
Utah Supreme Court
Decided July 23, 2002No. 20000776PublishedCited by 79 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WILKINS, Justice:
11 Plaintiffs appeal two district court orders: an order granting summary judgment on plaintiffs' initial complaint and an order granting a motion to dismiss plaintiffs' amended complaint. We affirm both orders.
FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL CONTEXT
I. FACTUAL BACKGROUND
T2 Defendant Amalgamated Sugar Company ("Amalgamated") operates a sugar processing plant near Twin Falls, Idaho. Amalgamated is headquartered in Ogden, Utah. Plaintiffs Blake Waddoups and James Sparrow worked at the Twin Falls plant as "bulk loaders," operating the system that loaded sugar into rail cars. Waddoups was…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Textile Workers v. Lincoln Mills of Ala.Supreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Allis-Chalmers Corp. v. LueckSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Lingle v. Norge Division of Magic Chef, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Local 174, Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen & Helpers v. Lucas Flour Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by79 opinions
- Orvis v. JohnsonUtah Supreme Court · 2008
- Archuleta v. GaletkaUtah Supreme Court · 2011
- United States v. WelchCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2003
- Anderson Development Co. v. TobiasUtah Supreme Court · 2005
- Grynberg v. Questar Pipeline Co.Utah Supreme Court · 2003
74 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.