Legal Opinion

Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. MacKey

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided June 11, 1956No. 34PublishedCited by 967 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Burton

This action, presenting multiple claims for relief, was brought by Mackey and another in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division, in 1953. The court expressly directed that judgment be entered for the defendant, Sears, Roebuck & Co., on two, but less than all, of the claims presented. It also expressly determined that there was no just reason for delay in making the entry. After Mackey’s notice of appeal from that judgment to the Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit, Sears, Roebuck & Co. moved to dismiss the appeal for lack of appellate…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
  2. Cobbledick v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  3. Sibbach v. Wilson & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  4. Baltimore Contractors, Inc. v. BodingerSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
  5. Forgay v. ConradSupreme Court of the United States · 1848

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by967 opinions

  1. Green Tree Financial Corp.-Alabama v. RandolphSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Curtiss-Wright Corp. v. General Electric Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Spencer, White & Prentis Incorporated of Connecticut v. Pfizer IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1974
  4. Liberty Mutual Insurance v. WetzelSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Sullivan v. FinkelsteinSupreme Court of the United States · 1990

962 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API