Poveromo-Spring v. Exxon Corp.
District Court, D. New Jersey
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GREENAWAY, District Judge.
INTRODUCTION
This matter comes before me on plaintiffs’ objections to Magistrate Judge Joel A. Pisa-no’s Report and Recommendation of September 30, 1996 1 All papers submitted in support of and in opposition to the objection have been considered. This Court, after engaging in a de novo review of the Report and Recommendation, grants, in part, and denies, in part, plaintiffs’ motion. 2 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) (1990); Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b); Local Rules 40 A 3 & 40 D 5.
Complaints may be dismissed when a plaintiff fails to state a claim upon which relief can be granted.…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Cruz v. BetoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Dr. Julia Elizabeth Berry v. The Board of Supervisors of L.S.U., Etc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1983
- Schrob v. CattersonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1991
- James West v. Philadelphia Electric CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Elias v. Ungar's Food Products, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2008
- Doe v. ArtsNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2003
- Farrell v. Planters Lifesavers Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1998
- Cataldo v. MosesDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2004
- Drew v. Quest DiagnosticsDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 2014
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.