Legal Opinion

Poveromo-Spring v. Exxon Corp.

District Court, D. New Jersey

Decided June 26, 1997No. Civil Action 96-398 (JAG)PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

GREENAWAY, District Judge.

INTRODUCTION

This matter comes before me on plaintiffs’ objections to Magistrate Judge Joel A. Pisa-no’s Report and Recommendation of September 30, 1996 1 All papers submitted in support of and in opposition to the objection have been considered. This Court, after engaging in a de novo review of the Report and Recommendation, grants, in part, and denies, in part, plaintiffs’ motion. 2 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) (1990); Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b); Local Rules 40 A 3 & 40 D 5.

Complaints may be dismissed when a plaintiff fails to state a claim upon which relief can be granted.…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Cruz v. BetoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Dr. Julia Elizabeth Berry v. The Board of Supervisors of L.S.U., Etc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1983
  4. Schrob v. CattersonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1991
  5. James West v. Philadelphia Electric CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Elias v. Ungar's Food Products, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2008
  2. Doe v. ArtsNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2003
  3. Farrell v. Planters Lifesavers Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1998
  4. Cataldo v. MosesDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2004
  5. Drew v. Quest DiagnosticsDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 2014

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API