Legal Opinion
Drew v. Quest Diagnostics
District Court, N.D. Alabama
Decided January 17, 2014No. Civil Action No. CV-13-S-629-NEPublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
C. LYNWOOD SMITH, JR., District Judge.
Plaintiffs, Kenneth and Elizabeth Drew, assert claims against Quest Diagnostics (“Quest”), and Aerotek, Inc. (“Aerotek”), for: (1) negligence and/or wantonness (Count One); (2) negligent and/or wanton supervision or training (Count Two); (3) negligent and/or wanton retention (Count *1180Three); (4) negligent and/or wanton hiring (Count Four); (5) medical negligence and/or wantonness (Count Five); (6) combined and concurring negligence and/or wantonness (Count Six); (7) outrage (Count Seven); (8) prima facie and/or per se negligent…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Larry Bonner v. City of Prichard, AlabamaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1981
- Neal Horsley v. Gloria FeldtCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2002
- Karen Renee Augustus, a Minor, by Charles A. Augustus, Her Father, and Next Friend v. The Board of Public Instruction of Escambia County, FloridaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1962
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Abbott v. Austal USA, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. Alabama · 2023
- Allen v. Austal USA LLCDistrict Court, S.D. Alabama · 2023
- Ball v. McCoulloughDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 2019
- D.S. v. DunnDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 2022
- Marocchini v. Robert C. Brown, M.D., P.C.District Court, S.D. Alabama · 2021
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.