Legal Opinion
Farrell v. Planters Lifesavers Co.
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided October 5, 1998No. CIV. 97-1059 JAGPublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GREENAWAY, District Judge.
This matter comes before the Court on four motions: (1) the motion for summary judgment of Roberts & Finger, LLP, counsel for defendants Planters LifeSavers Company (“PLC”) and Nabisco, Inc. (“Nabisco”) (collectively “Defendants”); (2) the cross-motion of Kaiser, Saurborn & Mair, P.C., counsel for plaintiff Susan Farrell (“Farrell”), to compel discovery and preclude evidence withheld by Defendants; (3) Defendants’ motion appealing Magistrate Judge Haneke’s February 19. 1998 order denying their motion to compel discovery; and (4) Defendants’ motion appealing…
2Cases cited62 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- St. Mary's Honor Center v. HicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Susan Farrell v. Planters Lifesavers Company Nabisco, IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
- Little v. National Broadcasting Co., Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2002
- Price v. Delaware Department of CorrectionDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1999
- Housing Works, Inc. v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1999
- Rodriguez v. TorresDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1999
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.