Legal Opinion
Schrob v. Catterson
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided November 15, 1991No. 90-6051PublishedCited by 348 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
HUTCHINSON, Circuit Judge.
I
Assistant United States Attorney James Catterson (Catterson) and Drug Enforcement Agency (DEA) agents David Toracin-ta and John Peluso (collectively “the Agents”) appeal the order of the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey denying their Rule 12(b)(6) motions to dismiss appellants’ complaint against them on the grounds of absolute and qualified immunity. Irwin Schrob, his wife Barbara Schrob, and Matawan Building Supplies (Schrob)1 filed a complaint containing claims arising under Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of the…
2Cases cited63 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by348 opinions
- McTernan v. City of York, Penn.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2009
- Kulwicki v. DawsonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992
- Mitchell v. DodrillDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2010
- Caver v. City of TrentonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2005
- Odd v. MaloneCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
343 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.