Cruz v. Beto
Supreme Court of the United States
1Per curiam
The complaint, alleging a cause of action under 42 U. S. C. § 1983, states that Cruz is a Buddhist, who is in a Texas prison. While prisoners who are members of other religious sects are allowed to use the prison chapel, Cruz is not. He shared his Buddhist religious material with other prisoners and, according to the allegations, in retaliation was placed in solitary confinement on a diet of bread and water for two weeks, without access to newspapers, magazines, or other sources of news. He also alleged that he was prohibited from corresponding with his religious advisor in the Buddhist sect.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Johnson v. AverySupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Torcaso v. WatkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Ex Parte HullSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Cooper v. PateSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2,746 opinions
- Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Bell v. WolfishSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Papasan v. AllainSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Hudson v. PalmerSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
2,741 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.