Utah v. American Pipe & Construction Co.
District Court, C.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTION OPPOSING CLASS ACTION
PENCE, District Judge.
On May 13, 1969, the State of Utah filed this “western pipe” Sherman § 1 antitrust action against certain concrete and steel pipe manufacturing companies, seeking treble damages and injunctive relief on its own behalf and in addition, claimed to represent a class described as (1) “those public bodies and agencies of state and local government in the State of Utah who are end users of pipe acquired from the defendants, co-conspirators and others” 1 and (2) those states in the Western Area which have not previously filed…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Eisen v. Carlisle & JacquelinCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1968
- Dolgow v. AndersonDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1968
- State of Washington v. American Pipe & Construction Co.District Court, D. Hawaii · 1968
- Maricopa County v. American Pipe and Construction Co.District Court, D. Arizona · 1969
- City of New York v. International Pipe & Ceramics Corp.District Court, D. New York · 1968
3Cited by22 opinions
- Dolores DONINGER Et Al., Appellants, v. PACIFIC NORTHWEST BELL, INC., AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
- Al Barnett & Son, Inc. v. Outboard Marine Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 1974
- Jimenez v. Domino's Pizza, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2006
- Gabel v. Hughes Air Corp.District Court, C.D. California · 1972
- Minersville Coal, Co v. Anthracite Export Ass'nDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1971
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.