Legal Opinion
Maricopa County v. American Pipe and Construction Co.
District Court, D. Arizona
Decided August 1, 1969No. Civ. A. 69-149 PHXPublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS TO DISMISS AND/OR FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
PENCE, District Judge.
The defendants above named have each and all filed motions to dismiss and/or for summary judgment against the plaintiff, maintaining that its Sherman 1 and 2 antitrust action is barred by the statute of limitations and laches. Some defendants have raised additional grounds, fully discussed hereafter. The chronological sequence of events preceding the filing of plaintiff’s action on April 19, 1969, and its amended complaint on May 22, 1969 is therefore important.
CHRONOLOGY OF EVENTS
On March 10, 1964,…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- United States v. Socony-Vacuum Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
- United States v. Borden Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
- The Flintkote Company, a Corporation v. Elmer Lysfjord and Walter R. Waldron, Doing Business as Aabeta Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1957
- Perkins v. Standard Oil Co. of Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Suckow Borax Mines Consolidated, Inc. v. Borax Consolidated, LimitedCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1950
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- American Pipe & Construction Co. v. UtahSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Morton's Market, Inc. v. Gustafson's Dairy, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1999
- Mt. Hood Stages, Inc., Dba Pacific Trailways v. The Greyhound Corporation and Greyhound Lines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
- Utah v. American Pipe & Construction Co.District Court, C.D. California · 1969
- State v. American Pipe & Construction Co.District Court, C.D. California · 1970
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.