Minersville Coal, Co v. Anthracite Export Ass'n
District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MUIR, District Judge.
The question before the Court is whether to grant plaintiffs’ renewed motion for an order that this action be maintained as a class action. The motion will be denied.
In 1968, 64 plaintiffs, all of whom are members of the Independent Miners and Associates (IMA), filed the original complaint. They charged the defendants with a combination to monopolize sales of anthracite to the U.S. Army in West Germany in violation of the Sherman and Clayton Acts.1 The damages claimed exceed $10,000,000.
In 1970 an amended complaint was filed in which the number of plaintiffs is 18.
R…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Demarco v. EdensCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1968
- Haywood Cash and Rennell Cash v. Swifton Land CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1970
- William Goldman Theatres, Inc. v. Paramount Film Distributing Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1969
- Utah v. American Pipe & Construction Co.District Court, C.D. California · 1969
3Cited by23 opinions
- McNichols v. Loeb Rhoades & Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1982
- Al Barnett & Son, Inc. v. Outboard Marine Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 1974
- Jaynes v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006
- Welling v. AlexyDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1994
- Zeffiro v. First Pennsylvania Banking & Trust Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1983
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.