Legal Opinion
Al Barnett & Son, Inc. v. Outboard Marine Corp.
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided August 13, 1974No. Civ. A. No. 4453PublishedCited by 42 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
LATCHUM, Chief Judge.
Plaintiffs’ motion presently before the Court seeks an order pursuant to Rule 23(c)(1), F.R.Civ.P., to maintain this case as a class action.
This private antitrust suit charges the defendant with violations of Section 1 of the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1, and Section 3 of the Clayton Act, 15 U.S.C. § 14. Jurisdiction is based on Sections 4 and 16 of the Clayton Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 15 and 26. The plaintiffs seek to recover treble damages, suit costs, including reasonable attorney fees, and to obtain injunctive relief for alleged injuries to the business and…
2Cases cited50 opinions
- Eisen v. Carlisle & JacquelinSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Hansberry v. LeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Hawaii v. Standard Oil Co. of Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Reuben J. Katz, on Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated v. Carte Blanche CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1974
- Eisen v. Carlisle & JacquelinCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1968
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by42 opinions
- Elsie Simer v. Richard J. Rios, Acting Director of Community Services Administration Community Services AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1981
- Al Barnett & Son, Inc. v. Outboard Marine CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1979
- Schwab v. Philip Morris USA, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2006
- In re Fine Paper Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1979
- Amswiss International Corp. v. Heublein, Inc.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 1975
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.