City of New York v. International Pipe & Ceramics Corp.
District Court, D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
RYAN, District Judge.
Defendant KERR CONCRETE PIPE COMPANY (KERR) has moved for an order under F.R.Civ.P. 23(c) (1) determining that this action may not be maintained as a class action. All of the defendants have joined in this motion; none seek the protection of Rule 23(c) (2) as amended, which provides that a judgment in a class action binds all those in the described class “who have not requested exclusion, and whom the court finds to be members of the class.”
Plaintiff, THE CITY OF NEW YORK, and all of the intervening plaintiffs oppose this motion. They ask that affirmative relief be…
2Cited by9 opinions
- M. D. Rutledge v. Electric Hose & Rubber CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
- Minnesota v. United States Steel Corp.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1968
- Fidelis Corporation v. Litton Industries, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1968
- Johnson v. City of Baton RougeDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1970
- Hecht v. Cooperative for American Relief Everywhere, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1972
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.