Legal Opinion
Jimenez v. Domino's Pizza, Inc.
District Court, C.D. California
Decided September 26, 2006No. CV-04-1107-JVSPublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION
SELNA, District Judge.
Plaintiffs Wilber Jimenez (“Jimenez”) and Yair Rodriguez (“Rodriguez”), on behalf of themselves and other similarly situated, move this Court for an order certifying this suit as a class action, certifying Jimenez and Rodriguez as class representatives, and certifying Plaintiffs’ counsel of record as class *246counsel. Defendant Domino’s Pizza, LLC (“Domino’s”) opposes, arguing that Plaintiffs have not satisfied Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23 (“Rule 23”).
I. EVIDENTIARY MATTERS
A. Evidentiary Objections
As an initial…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Lee v. City Of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Hanlon v. Chrysler Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
- General Telephone Co. of the Northwest, Inc. v. Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Blackie v. BarrackCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Damassia v. Duane Reade, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2008
- Duran v. U.S. Bank National Assn.California Supreme Court · 2014
- Campbell v. Pricewaterhousecoopers, LLPDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2008
- Brown v. Federal Express Corp.District Court, C.D. California · 2008
- Cholakyan v. Mercedes-Benz USA, LLCDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2012
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.