Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Clarke

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 18, 1929No. Docket No. 6653PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNourse, J.

Plaintiff sued for damages, alleging malpractice on the part of defendant in his capacity as a physician and surgeon. The cause was tried with a jury, which rendered a verdict for plaintiff in the sum of one thousand dollars. Plaintiff moved for a new trial on the issue of damages alone. His motion was granted and the defendant appeals. Defendant moved for a new trial generally. His motion was denied. He takes a separate appeal from the judgment which was entered upon the verdict. Both appeals are taken upon typewritten transcripts.

In August, 1921, plaintiff incurred an injury somewhere near…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Treadwell v. NickelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
  2. Perkins v. TruebloodCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
  3. William Simpson Construction Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
  4. Markart v. ZeimerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924
  5. Hall v. SteeleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Huffman v. LindquistCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Engelking v. CarlsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
  3. Hines v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
  4. Nicholas v. JacobsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
  5. Bickford v. LawsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API