Legal Opinion

Bickford v. Lawson

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 2, 1938No. Civ. No. 5757PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThompson, J.

The plaintiffs have appealed from a judgment rendered pursuant to a directed verdict in favor of the defendant in a suit for damages for alleged malpractice in setting a broken leg. The verdict was directed on the theory that the plaintiffs failed to qualify certain medical experts to testify to the alleged malpractice and that there is no competent evidence upon which the jury was authorized to find a verdict against the defendant.

The appellants contend the court erred in striking from the record the testimony of Dr. William Harlan, in rejecting evidence of the use of X-ray machines in…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Pike v. . HonsingerNew York Court of Appeals · 1898
  2. Arais v. KalensnikoffCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Perkins v. TruebloodCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
  4. Hesler v. California Hospital Co.California Supreme Court · 1918
  5. Zoterell v. ReppMichigan Supreme Court · 1915

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Seneris v. HaasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  2. People v. WilsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  3. Sinz v. OwensCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
  4. Lashley v. KoerberCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  5. Matter of Estate of SpeakeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1987

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API