Legal Opinion
Nicholas v. Jacobson
California Court of Appeal
Decided April 13, 1931No. Docket No. 7458PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtNourse, P. J.
Plaintiff sued for damages for alleged malpractice. At the close of plaintiff’s case the trial court granted defendant’s motion for nonsuit. The plaintiff has appealed on a bill of exceptions.
This is the third trial of this cause. The first resulted in a verdict for plaintiff which was reversed by the Supreme Court on the grounds of insufficient evidence. (Nicholas v. Jacobson, 205 Cal. 577 [271 Pac. 1057].) The second trial terminated through the disagreement of the jury.
Plaintiff consulted Dr. L. P. Gilbert for medical attention to a condition resulting from varicose veins. He had…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Davis v. JudsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
- Perkins v. TruebloodCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
- Houghton v. DicksonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1916
- William Simpson Construction Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
- Estate of BrysonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Lawless v. CalawayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Huffman v. LindquistCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
- Loral Corp. v. MoyesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
- Vonault v. O'RourkeMontana Supreme Court · 1934
- Stacy v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1934
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.