Legal Opinion

Perkins v. Trueblood

California Supreme Court

Decided May 29, 1919No. L. A. No. 4951PublishedCited by 70 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. Stratton & Kaufman, Wm. P. Hubbard and Bowen Irwin for Appellant. ,

1Opinion of the CourtLennon, J.

This is an action for damages wherein the plaintiff recovered judgment against the defendant, a physician and surgeon, for alleged negligence in the performance of a surgical operation upon the plaintiff in setting a broken leg. The negligence relied upon for a cause of action is charged in those allegations of the complaint which aver: “That the plaintiff herein by an accident broke his leg during the month of April, 1912. That thereafter the plaintiff employed the defendant who is a surgeon, as such surgeon, for a reasonable reward to be paid therefor, to set and heal the same. That the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. McGraw v. KerrColorado Court of Appeals · 1912
  2. Houghton v. DicksonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1916
  3. Hesler v. California Hospital Co.California Supreme Court · 1918
  4. Zoterell v. ReppMichigan Supreme Court · 1915

3Cited by70 opinions

  1. Gagne v. BertranCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
  2. People v. WilsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  3. Huffman v. LindquistCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  4. Sinz v. OwensCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
  5. Barham v. WidingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930

65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API