Perkins v. Trueblood
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. Stratton & Kaufman, Wm. P. Hubbard and Bowen Irwin for Appellant. ,
1Opinion of the CourtLennon, J.
This is an action for damages wherein the plaintiff recovered judgment against the defendant, a physician and surgeon, for alleged negligence in the performance of a surgical operation upon the plaintiff in setting a broken leg. The negligence relied upon for a cause of action is charged in those allegations of the complaint which aver: “That the plaintiff herein by an accident broke his leg during the month of April, 1912. That thereafter the plaintiff employed the defendant who is a surgeon, as such surgeon, for a reasonable reward to be paid therefor, to set and heal the same. That the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- McGraw v. KerrColorado Court of Appeals · 1912
- Houghton v. DicksonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1916
- Hesler v. California Hospital Co.California Supreme Court · 1918
- Zoterell v. ReppMichigan Supreme Court · 1915
3Cited by70 opinions
- Gagne v. BertranCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
- People v. WilsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Huffman v. LindquistCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
- Sinz v. OwensCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
- Barham v. WidingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.