Legal Opinion

Hall v. Steele

California Supreme Court

Decided May 27, 1924No. L. A. No. 7318PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRichards, J.

This action was one wherein the plaintiff sought to recover damages from the defendant for injuries received as the alleged result of the negligence of the defendant in the performance of a surgical operation. The plaintiff headed her complaint with the caption, “Damages for Negligence,” and then proceeded to allege:

“1. That in and' about the month of October, 1920, and at all times herein mentioned, at Los Angeles, California, the defendant Gertrude Steele held herself out to the general public, and particularly to this plaintiff, as a surgeon and dermatologist, skilled in the art of such…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. McGraw v. KerrColorado Court of Appeals · 1912
  2. Houghton v. DicksonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1916
  3. Basler v. Sacramento Elec., Gas & Ry.California Supreme Court · 1913
  4. Harding v. Liberty Hospital Corp.California Supreme Court · 1918
  5. Wurdemann v. BarnesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1896

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Agarwal v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Rubino v. Utah Canning Co.California Court of Appeal · 1954
  3. Trimming v. HowardIdaho Supreme Court · 1932
  4. Mirich v. BalsingerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
  5. L. B. Laboratories, Inc. v. MitchellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API