Markart v. Zeimer
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
SHIELDS, J., pro tem.
This is an action for malpractice growing out of the employment of defendants by the plaintiff to perform a surgical operation on him for the cure or removal of a hernia in the region of the right groin.
The complaint was in two counts. The first count charges negligence in these particulars, “that the said defendants then and there so negligently, carelessly and unskillfully performed said operation in and upon plaintiff in this, that after they had made an incision, cut into and opened the body of plaintiff that they closed the inguinal canal through which the cord…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Ewing v. GoodeU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern Ohio · 1897
- Staloch v. HolmSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1907
- Perkins v. TruebloodCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
- Benson v. . DeanNew York Court of Appeals · 1921
- Evans v. RobertsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1915
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Cobbs v. GrantCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
- Huffman v. LindquistCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
- Lashley v. KoerberCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
- Hundley v. St. Francis HospitalCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
- Wright v. ConwayWyoming Supreme Court · 1925
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.