Legal Opinion

Engelking v. Carlson

California Supreme Court

Decided March 24, 1939No. S. F. 16099PublishedCited by 69 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEdmonds, J.

Each of the defendants in this case is a duly licensed and practicing physician and surgeon who has been sued by the plaintiff for physical injuries alleged to have been sustained as the result of his negligence in the performance of an operation. At the conclusion of plaintiff’s case a nonsuit was granted as to defendant Ream, and after hearing the evidence presented by the defendant Carlson, the trial judge directed a verdict in his favor. The appeal is from the judgments which followed the order and verdict.

Dr. Carlson, with the assistance of Dr. Ream, operated upon plaintiff for the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Ales v. RyanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
  2. Barham v. WidingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
  3. Perkins v. TruebloodCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
  4. Hesler v. California Hospital Co.California Supreme Court · 1918
  5. Armstrong v. WallaceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by69 opinions

  1. Seneris v. HaasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Lawless v. CalawayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  3. Salgo v. Leland Stanford Jr. University Board of TrusteesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
  4. People v. WilsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  5. Lysick v. WalcomCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968

64 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API