Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Weiss v. Industrial Commission

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 11, 1992No. 91-2294PublishedCited by 56 opinions

1Per curiam

We overruled a motion to dismiss Weiss’ complaint by entry dated May 27, 1992, 63 Ohio St.3d 1473, 591 N.E.2d 243. Perry and the commission, however, did not file their answer within fourteen days after receiving notice of the entry, as required by Civ.R. 12(A)(2)(a), and, on July 2, 1992, Weiss moved for default judgment pursuant to Civ.R. 55. On July 24, 1992, Perry and the commission requested leave to answer.

For the reasons that follow, we overrule the motion for leave to answer and the motion for default judgment. Moreover, because this disposition eliminates all justification for a writ…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. GTE Automatic Electric, Inc. v. ARC Industries, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Griffey v. RajanOhio Supreme Court · 1987
  3. In re Termination of Employment of PrattOhio Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Marion Production Credit Ass'n v. CochranOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Moore v. Emmanuel Family Training Center, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1985

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by56 opinions

  1. Christophel v. KukulinskyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1995
  2. Davis v. Immediate Medical Services, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1997
  3. State ex rel. Lindenschmidt v. Board of CommissionersOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  4. State Ex Rel. Connole v. Cleveland Board of EducationOhio Court of Appeals · 1993
  5. State ex rel. Ohio Democratic Party v. BlackwellOhio Supreme Court · 2006

51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API