Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Madden v. Windham Exempted Village School District Board of Education

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided April 26, 1989No. 87-1877PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAlice Robie Re snick, J.

Relator asserts that once respondent has credited her with one year of service for one hundred five days of substitute teaching, it can not later withdraw such a grant. Respondent contends that it has discretionary authority to withdraw the previous grant of one year of service of fewer than one hundred twenty days where relator, after resigning in. 1971, returns as a new employee several years later. Respondent further argues that a writ of mandamus is not proper, in part, because relator has an adequate remedy at law.

We initially note that this court in State, ex rel. Villari, v. Bedford…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Fenske v. McGovernOhio Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Aebli v. Board of EducationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
  3. State ex rel. Cities Service Oil Co. v. OrtecaOhio Supreme Court · 1980
  4. State ex rel. Board of Education v. Butler County Budget CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1987
  5. State Ex Rel. Ford v. Board of Education of City School DistrictOhio Supreme Court · 1943

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. Koos v. Central Ohio Cellular, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1994
  2. State ex rel. Chavis v. Sycamore City School District Board of EducationOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  3. State ex rel. Manley v. Walsh (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2014
  4. State ex rel. Caspar v. City of DaytonOhio Supreme Court · 1990
  5. AtriCure, Inc. v. Jian MengCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2021

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API