Vance v. Gilbert
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.
The above-named appellants appeal from the judgment in favor of the plaintiffs, from an order denying their motion for a new trial, and from an order denying their motion to retax costs.
The complaint states a cause of action upon a promissory note dated October 26, 1910, for seven hundred dollars executed by the above-named appellants, payable to said Halladay Motor Car Company, four months after date, and to foreclose an alleged equitable mortgage upon a tract of land, for the security of said note. It is alleged that the note was indorsed by the Halladay Motor Car Company to the plaintiffs…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Duncan v. RamishCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- People v. GlazeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
- People v. Woon Tuck WoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- Downing v. Le DuCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- Gavin v. GavinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
3Cited by11 opinions
- Fawkes v. ReynoldsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
- Coppola v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
- Proctor v. ArakelianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
- Cassetta v. BaimaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
- Bryant v. WellbanksCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.