Legal Opinion

Coppola v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 22, 1989No. Docket Nos. B038583, B039704PublishedCited by 23 opinions

[Opinion certified for partial publication.*]

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

DANIELSON, J.

By their initial petition for a writ of mandate or other extraordinary relief (B038583), Francis Ford Coppola (Francis), Eleanor Coppola (Eleanor), Zoetrope Productions (Zoetrope), and Hollywood General Studios, Inc. (HGS; collectively, defendants) 1 seek to overturn respondent court’s order dated November 21, 1988, granting summary adjudication of certain issues. By a second and a supplemental (or third) petition for such relief (B039704), defendants seek, inter alia, to overturn or modify the court’s orders dated January 20 and 30, 1989, in which the court barred…

2Cases cited56 opinions

  1. Butner v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Wright v. Union Central Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. Roseleaf Corp. v. ChierighinoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
  4. Cornelison v. KornbluthCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Brown v. JensenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953

51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. First Nationwide Savings v. PerryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
  2. Cardon v. Cotton Lane Holdings, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Citicorp Real Estate, Inc. v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
  4. Nichols v. KellerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
  5. Varni Bros. Corp. v. Wine World, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1995

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API