Legal Opinion

Bryant v. Wellbanks

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 31, 1927No. Docket No. 5873PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PARKER, J., pro tem.

This is an appeal hy defendant from a judgment rendered in favor of plaintiff, and there is brought for review the order of the trial court denying defendant’s motion for a new trial.

The facts will be given hereinafter as the grounds of appeal are considered.

The original complaint was filed on June 5, 1923, alleging that A. J. Bryant, doing business under the name of Bryant Produce Company, shipped certain tomatoes to Webster Wellbanks and W. P. Day, doing business under the firm name of Wellbanks & Co., for which no accounting was had, and alleging further the…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Frost v. WitterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  2. Doolittle v. McConnellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
  3. Rabe v. Western Union Telegraph Co.California Supreme Court · 1926
  4. Rudneck v. Southern California Metal & Rubber Co.California Supreme Court · 1920
  5. Holden v. MensingerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Kadota Fig Ass'n of Producers v. Case-Swayne Co.California Court of Appeal · 1946
  2. Hunter v. CunningOregon Supreme Court · 1945
  3. Madison Fork Ranch v. L & B Lodge Pole Timber ProductsMontana Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Abbott v. Limited Mutual Compensation Insurance Co.California Court of Appeal · 1938
  5. Hess v. MoodeyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API